White Fragility? You Sure About That?

By now, you’ve likely heard the term “White Fragility.” It’s another rhetorical weapon recently added to the Leftist arsenal. Robin DiAngelo, the Marxist amazon who coined the idiom, defines it thus:

White Fragility is a state in which even a minimum amount of racial stress becomes intolerable, triggering a range of defensive moves. These moves include the outward display of emotions such as anger, fear, and guilt, and behaviors such as argumentation, silence, and leaving the stress-inducing situation. These behaviors, in turn, function to reinstate white racial equilibrium.

The ‘minimum amount of racial stress’?

Well, let’s just reflect a moment on what that ‘minimum’ is: it’s the accusation that every White is, by his mere existence, injuring all nonwhite people; and that, under the presumption that Whites are corporately responsible for the unfortunate condition of all Brown people throughout history; and all under the circumstance of a government which is systematically dispossessing and marginalizing Whites in manifold ways on behalf of the nonwhite mob, who define themselves in terms of their unremitting contempt of European man.

Let’s not forget that the accusation is uniformly leveled with an implicit threat of violence from the accuser. Or, at minimum, the insistence that …

Read more at the Faith and Heritage blog
(The opinions in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Southern Nation News or SN.O.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *