(Even northern liberals recognize that monument removals are counter-productive, especially a RECONCILLIATION monument. In this case, the writer wants ‘contextual’ signage. Why not leave well-enough alone and let people decide for themselves? Y’all say you want ‘democracy.’ That’s it. – DD)
We don’t Want your Money! We Need your Help! Spread the Word! Like, Share, Re-Tweet, and Subscribe! There’s a lot more to see at our main page, Dixie Drudge!
(WaPo) – The Aug. 8 Metro article “Suit seeks to halt removal of Arlington Cemetery’s Confederate Memorial” told of a suit filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia brought by the Sons of Confederate Veterans seeking to prevent the dismantlement of the statue erected with funds from the United Daughters of the Confederacy and dedicated in 1914 with President Woodrow Wilson as speaker.
There’s no question that Vice Chair Ty Seidule and the Naming Commission’s third and final report calling for the removal of all sculptural elements above the memorial’s granite base was correct that the UDC’s action was done to provide legitimacy for those who fought for the Confederacy.
But to my mind, we in our polarized nation need to be sensitive to the entire span of our nation’s history, all of it — the good, the bad and the ugly. I, for one, think the memorial (with its Latin inscription “Victrix causa diis placuit sed victa Catoni” that puts a…